Benson Pump Co. v. South Central Pool Supply, Inc.
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
McQUAID, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration (Doc. # 11). Plaintiff has opposed the motion (Doc. #37) and Defendant has replied (Doc. # 38). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Compel Arbitration is granted.
BACKGROUND
On January 8, 1999, Defendant South Central Pool Supply (“SCP”) 1 entered into an Asset Purchase Agreement (“the Agreement”) with Plaintiff Benson Pump Co. (“Benson Pump”) 2 , .a small chemical corporation, to purchase “substantially all” of Benson Pump’s business assets (Doc. # 11, Ex. 1; Doc. # 37…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Genesco, Inc. v. T. Kakiuchi & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Simula, Inc. v. Autoliv, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Sky Law Group v. Paul Padda Law, PLLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2024