Legal Opinion

Sarmiento v. Davis Boat & Oar Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 21, 1895PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion by complainants to dismiss appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This suit was brought under the watercraft law of this State. The vessel, which had been attached, was released upon the filing of a bond, signed “The Davis Boat & Oar Company, by Edgar A. Davis, President.” Judgment went against the boat company and George S. Davis, the surety on the bond. Both complainants and defendants appealed to this Court. The appeal bond was signed by the Davis Boat & Oar Company in the same manner as was the bond upon which the judgment is based. No objection was taken to the form of that bond, and the authority of Mr. Davis, its president, to execute it was not…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. American Insurance v. OakleyNew York Court of Chancery · 1842
  2. Preston National Bank v. George T. Smith Middlings Purifier Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Oakley v. Working Men's Union Benevolent SocietyNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1859

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Bank of Commerce v. B. W. Marr & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API