James v. State

This is a companion ease to Meschew v. State of Oklahoma, 97 Okla. Cr. 352, 264 P. 2d 391. A complete statement of the facts is set forth in the *356Meschew case and reference may be had to that opinion for the facts herein involved. Meschew and James were jointly charged.

The sole question raised in both of said cases is that the trial court submitted to the jury instructions Nos. 10 and 13 which it is claimed were prejudicial to the defendant, which claims were predicated upon the fact that the trial court interlined the instructions striking out the word “ten” in both of said instructions by…