Legal Opinion

Foreman v. Walters

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided December 7, 1917PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from McCracken Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Chief Justice Settle

Affirming.

The reversal of the judgment rendered by tbe circuit ■court in this case is asked by tbe appellant on tbe ground that tbe amending of tbe petition, by certain interlineations, permitted by that court, made sucb a material change in tbe claim sued on, or cause of action, as rendered necessary tbe issuance and service upon appellant of another summons in tbe case; and that as this was not •clone, tbe court was without jurisdiction to render tbe judgment appealed from. In the form originally drafted and filed, tbe petition in stating tbe name…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Louisville, Cincinnati & Lexington R. R. v. Case's administratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
  2. Heckman's Adm'r v. Lou. & Nash. R. R.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Joyes v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1874
  4. Gardner v. AlexanderCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. City of Madisonville v. NisbitCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API