Legal Opinion
Paul Harris v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Andpeter Petchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles County, Co-Respondents, the State Ofcalifornia, Real Party in Interest, Fawn Harris v. Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles, Andpeter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles, County, Co-Respondents, the People Ofthe State of California, Real Party in Interest
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 30, 1974No. 72-2849Published
1Opinion of the Court
500 F.2d 1124
Paul HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA For the COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, andPeter Petchess, Sheriff of Los
Angeles County, Co-Respondents, The
STATE OFCALIFORNIA, Real Party
in Interest, Appellees.
Fawn HARRIS, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
SUPERIOR COURT OF the STATE OF CALIFORNIA For the COUNTY OF
LOS ANGELES, andPeter Pitchess, Sheriff of Los Angeles,
County, Co-Respondents, The PEOPLE ofthe State of
California, Real Party in Interest, Appellees.
Nos. 72-2849, 72-2852.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
July 12, 1974, Rehearing Denied Aug. 30,…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Picard v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Brown v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Ex Parte RoyallSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Humphrey v. CadySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.