Legal Opinion
Huff v. Electric Plant Board of Monticello
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided March 8, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEWART, Judge.
The Monticello Electric Light Company sold its facilities for the distribution of electricity to the City of Monticello on January 20, 1954, and the city has henceforth managed the system through an agency known as the Electric Light Plant Board. We shall hereinafter refer to these parties as “the company”, “the city” and “the board”. As a part of the closing agreement, the city contracted with the company that it would collect its unpaid bills for electric current furnished and disconnect the service of a patron if his account was not paid. Carl F. Huff operated a sawmill near…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Barrett v. Broad River Power CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1928
- Kentucky Utilities Co. v. Warren Ellison CafeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
- Louisville Tobacco Warehouse Co. v. Louisville Water Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- Central Louisiana Power Co. v. ThomasMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Johnson v. Carolina Gas & Electric Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Union Electric Co. v. Mansion House Center North Redevelopment Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1973
- Boone County Sand & Gravel Co. v. Owen County Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1989
- Gary Miller v. Daniel MuchowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2023
- Huff v. Electric Plant Board of MonticelloCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957