Dart v. McQuilty

McQuilty purchased two lots in Greensbwrg from the other defendant, Dillier. He paid all the purchase-money, except the last note, on which there was judgment at law. After several assignments, the judgment finally came into the hands of Dart. He filed this complaint in the nature of a bill in chancery, to reach the equity of McQuilty—mailing the vendor, Dillier, a party.

Dillier and Me Quilty answered that the former owned only two-thirds of the lots, and could not convey according to contract.

Replication, that the failure of consideration resulting from Dillier's imperfect title had been set…