Legal Opinion

O'Rear v. Sutton

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided March 31, 1927No. 6 Div. 880PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBouldin, J.

The suit is on a promissory note by the payee against the makers.

The questions for review arise upon a plea of no consideration. The note was given for m amount agreed upon, in compromise and -.ettlement of disputed matters, evidenced by an agreement and release in writing, which appears in the report of the case.

One of the matters covered by the gen-, eral terms of the agreement as appears from the evidence was a claim for purchase money for lands of the plaintiff, a married woman, in that without her consent the money had been paid, if at all, not to her, nor any one duthorized to receive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte Southern Cotton Oil Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1922
  2. Prater v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1854
  3. Daniel v. HughesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Oaks v. City of Fairhope, Ala.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API