United States ex rel. Eichenlaub v. Watkins
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
Relator contends that 22 U.S.C.A. § 233 was repealed and that therefore he was not convicted of any crime enumerated in 8 U.S.C.A. § 157. We cannot agree; the 1940 Act did not repeal but merely increased the penalty prescribed in 22 U.S. C.A. § 233.3 Nor do we agree with his contention that 8 U.S.C.A. § 157 does not include one who was a citizen when convicted but who is subsequently denaturalized. We think the decree of denaturalization relates'back, at least for this purpose. Cf. Rosenberg v. United States, 3 Cir., 60 F.2d 475.
He also urges that the deportation warrant…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Mahler v. EbySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Rosenberg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
3Cited by9 opinions
- Costello v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States Ex Rel. Eichenlaub v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- United States v. EichenlaubCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- United States ex rel. Willumeit v. WatkinsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1949
- Elfido Gonzalez Castillo v. Pamela BondiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2025
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.