Legal Opinion

Saunders v. Pierce

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 6, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The plaintiff was injured while operating an amusement device, known as the Custer ear, a small four wheeled device resembling a miniature automobile propelled by electricity, in defendants’ amusement park. The defendants were bound to exercise reasonable care in seeing that this device was reason ably safe for those riding in and operating the car, and also in giving all of those, not familiar with its operation, adequate instruction in the method of operating and steering the car.

The jury might reasonably have found that the failure of the defendants to exercise such reasonable care was due…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Turgeon v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911
  2. Donovan v. Connecticut Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1911

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Garafola v. Rosecliff Realty Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1952
  2. Nordgren v. StrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API