Legal Opinion
Gibson v. King County
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided November 10, 2005No. C04-1940MJPPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
PECHMAN, District Judge.
Defendants have moved for summary judgment on all of Plaintiffs claims. Neither side has requested oral argument on this motion, and the Court does not find that oral argument is necessary to rule on this matter. Having received and reviewed Defendants’ Motion, Plaintiffs Response, and Defendants’ Reply, and all exhibits and documents submitted therewith, the Court hereby DENIES in part and GRANTS in part Defendants’ motion for summary judgment, consistent with the discussion below.
BACKGROUND
Plaintiff was a King County…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- T.W. Electrical Service, Inc. v. Pacific Electrical Contractors Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Patricia A. Brooks v. City of San Mateo, a Municipal Order and Corporation San Mateo Police Department John Stangl, Chief of Police Steven SelvaggioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wesley v. CBS Radio Services, IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2019
- Zelton v. FedEx Express CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025
- Zentz v. Dentive-Family First Dental LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023
- Zentz v. Dentive-Family First Dental LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2023