Legal Opinion · Dissent

Brown v. MacPherson's, Inc.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1975No. 43054Published

1DissentUtter, J.

(dissenting) — The trial court’s grant of the State’s motion to dismiss under CR 12(b)(6) can be affirmed only if “it is clear beyond doubt from a reading of the complaint that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.” Higgins v. State, 70 Wn.2d 323, 325, 422 P.2d 836 (1967). The majority concludes plaintiffs could not support a claim against the State because they cannot show that its agents had the power to avert this tragedy. I do not agree. There are two theories of liability in plaintiffs’ complaints under which State officers…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Rosenbloom v. Metromedia, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Evangelical United Brethren Church v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Morris v. McNicolWashington Supreme Court · 1974
  4. Joan M. Spaulding v. United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
  5. Mrs. Cordie Ola Fair v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API