Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

District Court, E.D. Virginia

Decided January 10, 1995No. Crim. A. 94-370-APublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ELLIS, District Judge.

Under 18 U.S.C. § 844(f), it is a federal crime to commit arson in respect of a property “owned, possessed, or used by, or leased to ... any institution or organization receiving Federal financial assistance.” A federal jury convicted defendant Cecil Davis of four charges based on this crime as a result of his participation in an arson committed at a townhouse leased to a person receiving Section 8 assistance. 1 Davis’s convictions are valid only if the townhouse was “owned, possessed, or used by, or leased to” an agency receiving federal funding. In…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
  3. United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States v. BassSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McDow v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2003
  2. United States v. Cecil McDonald DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1996
  3. Virginia v. RenoDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1997
  4. Administration of Coral Reef Resources in the Northwest Hawaiian Islands, Department of Justice Office of Legal Counsel2000
  5. Pharmaceutical Coalition for Patient Access v. United States of AmericaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2024

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API