Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Bowler v. Stewart-Warner Corp.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided August 18, 1989No. 86-1134Published

1ConcurrenceFerren, Associate Judge

Appellant Bowler filed a complaint alleging three counts: strict liability (the chair casters were “defective” and “unreasonably dangerous”); implied warranty (breach of implied warranty of the chair’s “fitness for its particular purpose”); and negligence.1 The trial court granted appel-lee Stéwart-Warner Corp.’s motion for a directed verdict as to the alleged breach of warranty and negligence but, interestingly, kept a warranty count alive by instructing the jury on the implied warranty of merchantability, as well as on strict liability. The trial court accordingly submitted the case to the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Greenman v. Yuba Power Products, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Azzarello v. Black Bros. Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Santor v. a & M KARAGHEUSIAN, INC.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1965
  5. Suter v. San Angelo Foundry & MacHine CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API