Dekuita Steen v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
VAIDIK, Judge.
Case Summary
Dekuita Steen appeals her Class D felony theft conviction. She contends that the trial court erred in admitting a loss-prevention officer’s testimony concerning security tags and store labels into evidence because it was inadmissible hearsay and there is insufficient evidence to sustain her conviction. Finding that the evidence was properly admitted and the evidence is sufficient, we affirm.
Facts and Procedural History
On Black Friday, November 26, 2010, Kyle Hadley, a loss-prevention officer employed by U.S. Security, was working at H & M clothing store in…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Kimbrough v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2009
- Robinson v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1999
- Bond v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
- Gee v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1988
- Stephans v. StateNevada Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Antonio L. Vaughn v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
- Nikita L. Minor v. State of Indiana and Fishers Police Department (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019