Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Bruner
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided October 20, 2005PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed July 23, 2004, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.
Claimant challenges a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, reversing the finding of the Administrative *947Law Judge, that she was disqualified from receiving benefits because she lost her employment as a senior school secretary due to misconduct and made willful false statements to obtain benefits. The record establishes that a…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Claim of McGloinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re the Claim of LoveAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of CedenoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
3Cited by4 opinions
- In re the Claim of ChisholmAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re LumbrazoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- In re the Claim of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re the Claim of HernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012