Legal Opinion

Shane v. Mouw

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 8, 1982No. Docket 52651PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJ. R. Ernst, J.

The essential facts of this case are accurately set forth in Judge Mackenzie’s dissenting opinion.

Accepting plaintiffs version of the facts as correct for purposes of this appeal, it appears the parties commenced a physician-patient relationship in 1961 which continued into 1977. GCR 1963, 116.3. Between 1965 and May, 1977, plaintiff visited defendant’s office 63 times, and defendant regularly prescribed medication for plaintiffs condition.

Plaintiff further claims that she last visited defendant’s office in July, 1977. At that time, she asserts, it was necessary for her to use a walker…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. DeGrazia v. JohnsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Morgan v. TaylorMichigan Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Coddington v. RobertsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Stapleton v. City of WyandotteMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Weaver v. University of Michigan Board of RegentsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Pendell v. JarkaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API