Legal Opinion

Fry v. Arndt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 7, 1989No. 3-88-0696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Barry

The petitioners, George D. Fry and Louis E. Neuendorf, as coexecutors of the estate of Clara S. Fry, filed a petition for the equitable apportionment of estate taxes, attorney fees, and expenses of administration against the respondent, David Arndt, who is the beneficiary of an inter vivos trust established by the decedent. The respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. Following a hearing on the respondent’s motion, the trial court granted it. The petitioners appeal.

Taken with this appeal is the petitioners’ motion to amend the record pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 329 (107 Ill. 2d…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riggs v. Del DragoSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. People v. GuestIllinois Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Roe v. Estate of FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1978
  4. In Re Estate of GowlingIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  5. First Methodist Church v. OwensAppellate Court of Illinois · 1965

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of FryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. In Re Estate of LindAppellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  3. In Re Estate of OverturfAppellate Court of Illinois · 2004
  4. In Re Estate of WilliamsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Estate of Lurie v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API