Turner v. Wright
Illinois Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Schaefer
The plaintiff, a resident of Illinois, bought an automobile in Indiana, brought it into Illinois and used it here. Under the terms of the Use Tax Act, (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1955, chap. 120, pars. 439.1-439.18,) a tax thereupon became due. He paid it under protest, and brought this action to secure a refund. The circuit court dismissed his complaint and he appeals.
The Use Tax Act was enacted in 1955. It imposes a tax “upon the privilege of using in this State tangible personal property purchased at retail * * * from a retailer.” (Section 3.) It applies whether the property is purchased in Illinois…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Reif v. BarrettIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
- Commonwealth v. BarnettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1901
- City of St. Louis v. TiefelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1868
- Harder's Fire Proof Storage & Van Co. v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1908
- Mahon v. NudelmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Thorpe v. MahinIllinois Supreme Court · 1969
- Harbor v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- O'Connor v. a & P EnterprisesIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
- Hagerty v. General Motors Corp.Illinois Supreme Court · 1974
- In Re John Arthur Rosenow v. State of Illinois, Department of Revenue, in Re Robert M. Hull v. State of Illinois, Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.