Legal Opinion
Layne, Inc. v. Moody
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided August 30, 1994No. WD 48918PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BERREY, Judge.
The trial court sustained respondent’s Motion to Dismiss the petition for failure to state a claim for which relief could be granted. Appellant appeals this decision.
Respondent was at all times relevant to this matter the Commissioner of the Missouri Office of Administration (MOA).
In 1992, MOA employed Maecorp, Inc. to assess the condition of ground water under certain property. MOA did not require Mae-corp to provide a payment bond to cover costs of labor and materials provided by subcontractors or others on the project. Mae-corp employed appellant as a sub-contractor to drill…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lovelace v. Long John Silver's, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Redbird Engineering Sales, Inc. v. Bi-State Development AgencyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1991
- Burgess v. Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1953
- Energy Masters Corp. v. FulsonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Dowdy v. Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1964
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wells v. WellsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Union Pacific R. Co. v. Midland Equities Inc.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1999
- Layne, Inc. v. MoodyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997