Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903Published

PROM DAVIDSON. Appeal in error from the Criminal Court of Davidson County. — W. M. Hart., Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The plaintiff in error was indicted for keeping open his employer’s saloon on Sunday. He was convicted, and sentenced to pay a fine of $25 and the costs of the cause. He has appealed in error to this court.

The facts shown by the record are as follows:. Plaintiff in error was a bartender for Charles Geiger, the owner of a saloon on Church street, in the city of Nashville. On Sunday, the first day of November, 1903, about 9 o’clock in the morning, the plaintiff in error was found in the saloon of his employer by an officer, who Went there for the purpose of investigating a rumor he had heard as…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McGuire v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Memphis Trust Co. v. BlessingTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  3. McKinney v. NashvilleTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API