Legal Opinion

Bituminous Insurance Co. v. Coker

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 8, 2012No. A11A1757PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOGGS, Judge.

We granted Bituminous Insurance Company’s (Bituminous) application for interlocutory review of the trial court’s denial of its motion for summary judgment on Carolyn Ann Coker’s claim for uninsured motorist benefits. At issue is whether Coker provided eyewitness testimony to corroborate her description of how an unknown motorist caused an accident in which her husband, Terry Broom, was killed. Because no eyewitness testimony corroborated Coker’s version of events, Bituminous was entitled to judgment as a matter of law. We therefore reverse.

Summary judgment is appropriate when…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Lau's Corp., Inc. v. HaskinsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Benton v. BentonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2006
  3. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. GuestCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1992
  4. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. AdamsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2010
  5. Hoffman v. DoeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. American Alternative Insurance Company v. BennettCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Angela Reaves v. State Farm Mutual AutomobileCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  3. Reaves v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API