Legal Opinion
Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf v. Bergelectric Corp.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided December 4, 2025No. 2:23-cv-00115Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 Jorge E. Ordonez Maluf, Case No. 2:23-cv-00115-CDS-MDC 5 Plaintiff Order Resolving Plaintiff’s Motion for Leave, Renewed Motion for Revision of 6 v. Orders, Motion to Stay Discovery, and Objection, and Defendant’s Motion for 7 Bergelectric Corp., Sanctions 8 Defendant [ECF No. 109, 110, 113, 122, 127, 128] 9 10 Pro se plaintiff Jorge Maluf brings this employment discrimination action against 11 Bergelectric Corp. See ECF No. 8. Pending before the court are the following: (1) Maluf’s motion 12 for leave to file documents under seal (ECF…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- Richard L. Zaldivar v. City of Los Angeles, and Margaret Salazar, Intervenors-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.