Legal Opinion

Grinkorn v. Seeley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 6, 2006PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action, inter alia, to recover damages for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (LeVine, J.), dated June 27, 2005, which denied his motion to vacate his default in proceeding to trial and restore the case to the trial calendar.

*377Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

CPLR 5015 (a) allows a court to vacate a default entered against a party “upon such terms as may be just” if the default was “excusable” (CPLR 5015 [a] [1]). In order to establish that a default is excusable, a party must show both a reasonable excuse…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. P & K Marble, Inc. v. PearceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  2. Zeltser v. SacerdoteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  3. Kumar v. Yonkers Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. Zacher v. Oakdale Islandia Ltd. PartnershipAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wadsworth v. SweetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Ganach v. MilloulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021
  3. Wadsworth v. SweetAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API