Legal Opinion · Dissent

Teshome-Gebreegziabher v. Mukasey

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided October 30, 2008No. 08-1060Published

1DissentMichael, Circuit Judge

I respectfully dissent from the court’s refusal to rehear this case en bane. The panel opinion adopts an incorrect standard for granting the stay of an order of removal pending consideration of an alien’s petition for review. The opinion misapplies 8 U.S.C. § 1252(f)(2), which provides a heightened standard for granting injunctions against the operation of immigration laws, to stays of removal. The panel’s approach has been soundly rejected by eight other circuits. See Tesfamichael v. Gonzales, 411 F.3d 169 (5th Cir.2005); Hot v. Gonzales, 400 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 2005); Douglas v. Ashcroft,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Reno v. American-Arab Anti-Discrimination CommitteeSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  2. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. v. Mayacamas Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Walters v. Metropolitan Educational Enterprises, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Arevalo v. AshcroftCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  5. Dan Marius Andreiu v. John Ashcroft, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API