Kendrick v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
'Smith, J.
Appellants were separately indicted, tried and convicted for selling intoxicating liquors, ¡but the issues raised on their separate appeals are so nearly identical that a single opinion will suffice to dispose of both cases.
A motion was filed in each case for a change of venue, and the supporting affidavits appear to have been made by the same affiants in each case. There were sixteen of these affidavits, but only ten of the affiants were examined on the hearing of the petitions. These affiants gave testimony to the following effect. The death of the sheriff made a special election…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Spurgeon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1923
- Whitehead v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
- Cox v. CooleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
- Wingfield v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1910
- Boone v. HolderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1908
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
- Allen v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. AmeerNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2018
- Reeves v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977