Legal Opinion

Caruso v. Ward

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 14, 1989PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Norman C. Ryp, J.

This is a CPLR article 78 proceeding in which petitioners, Phil Caruso and the Patrolmen’s Benevolent Association of the City of New York, Inc., seek to annul respondents’ (Benjamin Ward, the Police Department of the City of New York and the City of New York) new administrative policy effective May 24, 1988, limiting the number of pistols and/or revolvers a retired New York City police officer may have on his or her *6carry license to two. For the reasons stated hereinbelow, petitioners’ application is denied.

A. FACTS

Petitioner, Phil Caruso, is the president…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McKernan v. City of New York Civil Service CommissionAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Minerva v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Minerva v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. McKernan v. City of New York Civil Service CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Caruso v. WardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API