State v. Surma
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
263 Wis. 388 (1953)
STATE, Respondent,
vs.
SURMA and another, Appellants.[*]
Supreme Court of Wisconsin.
February 6, 1953.
March 3, 1953.
For the appellants there was a brief and oral argument by Allan Cain of Kaukauna.
For the respondent there was a brief by the Attorney General and William A. Platz, assistant attorney general, and oral argument by Mr. Platz.
FRITZ, C. J.
On June 19, 1951, a dog owned by Harley Heinz, who was a neighbor of the appellants, wandered and strayed over to a farm owned by the appellants' parents. Appellants had never seen the dog before, and did not know whose dog it was.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GalloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
- Eau Claire National Bank v. BensonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1900
- State ex rel. Heiden v. RyanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
- People v. . ElliottNew York Court of Appeals · 1902
- Manley v. MayerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.