Legal Opinion
Herrera v. Braunstein
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided January 5, 2006PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Amended judgment entered October 5, 2003 modified by vacating the damages awards and directing a new trial on the issue of damages only; as modified, amended judgment affirmed, without costs. Appeal from judgment entered on or about March 13, 2003 dismissed, without costs, as superseded by defendant’s appeal from the amended judgment.
This is an action for personal injuries caused by an assault. The plaintiff and the defendant were the only witnesses who testified at the trial. The jury returned a verdict for $150,000 for past emotional distress, $150,000 for future…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Behan v. Data Probe International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Bert v. Port Authority of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Electchester Housing Project, Inc. v. RosaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Falcaro v. KessmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by2 opinions
- Allam v. MeyersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Herrera v. BraunsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008