Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Knoppel

Fairfax County Circuit Court

Decided November 2, 1993No. Case No. (Criminal) 80191Published

1Opinion of the Court

By Judge Thomas A. Fortkort

This case arose on appeal of a Driving While Intoxicated conviction from General District Court. Defendant, Marten Knoppel, moved to suppress evidence obtained in an investigatory stop of his automobile. The Court took the matter under advisement and proceeded to hear evidence. At the close of the Commonwealth’s case, the defendant moved to strike the Commonwealth’s evidence. For the reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion to suppress and sustains defendant’s motion to strike.

The facts giving rise to this matter are outlined in the parties’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Delaware v. ProuseSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  4. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Brower Ex Rel. Estate of Caldwell v. County of InyoSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API