Legal Opinion
Young v. Cumberland Grocery Co.
Court of Appeals of Tennessee
Decided May 28, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrownover, J.
This action is incorrectly styled; it should be styled, Cumberland Grocery Company, plaintiff in error, against Mrs. H. G. Young and Nannie Young, defendants in error, as the Youngs obtained judgments in the lower court.
These are actions by mother and daughter for personal injuries received in an automobile accident caused by the collision of their automobile with a truck owned and operated by the Cumberland Grocery Company, and were tried together because their injuries were the result of the same accident.
On May 31, 1927, Mrs. H. G. Young and her minor daughter, Nannie Young, were riding in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Byers v. RailroadTennessee Supreme Court · 1895
- Burns v. Peoples Telephone & Telegraph Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
- Reed v. Cincinnati, N. O. & T. P. Ry. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1916
- La Follette Coal, Iron & Railway Co. v. MintonTennessee Supreme Court · 1906
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- AL Kornman Co. v. METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT, ETC.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1965
- Elliott v. Equalization BoardTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
- Turnblazer v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1964
- First National Bank of Lenoir City v. IvieCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1955
- Patsy Freeman, Personal Representative and Administratrix of the Estate of John R. Freeman v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2011