Legal Opinion

In re Luna Amusement Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided March 6, 1934No. 24542Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOSCOWITZ, District Judge.

This is a motion to confirm the composition and fix the compensation to be paid to each receiver, there being two in number. Specifications have been filed by the Manhattan Company objecting to the composition.

The specifications are insufficient and overruled. Motion to confirm the composition is granted.

Each receiver has requested an allowance of $2,231.34. No objection has been made to this allowance. In fact, counsel for the alleged bankrupt has filed a consent dated February 27, 1934, as follows:

“In behalf of Luna Amusement Company, alleged bankrupt, we stipulate…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re Mills Tea & Butter Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API