Legal Opinion

Schwoyer v. Fenstermacher

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 2, 1977No. 74 and 75PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

Appellant brought an action to rescind an agreement to sell her farm to appellees, on the theory that appellees had failed to perform within the time provided for in the agreement. In response, appellees brought an action against appellant for specific performance of the agreement. The actions were consolidated, and the chancellor decided both in favor of appellees. His findings may be, summarized as follows:

An agreement of sale was executed on August 3, 1971. Appellant was represented by R. Joseph Merkel, attorney, and with her knowledge and consent Merkel was retained by…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Cohn v. Weiss Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
  2. Warner Co. v. MacMullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  3. New Eastwick Corp. v. Philadelphia Builders Eastwick Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  4. C.I.T. Corp. v. JonnetSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  5. DiGiuseppe v. DiGiuseppeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Western Savings Fund Society v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  2. Douglas v. BensonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Bantam Four Cinemas, Inc. v. ZamiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Hirth v. Estate of Warris, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County2005
  5. Western Savings Fund Society v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API