Legal Opinion

Go Fun v. Fidalgo Island Canning Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1905No. 4907PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Skagit county, Joiner, J., entered March 11, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action upon contract.

1Opinion of the CourtMount, C. J.

This action was begun by the respondent to recover from appellant an alleged balance on a contract for canning fish. The-complaint alleges the contract, a compliance therewith by the respondent, and a balance due him, amounting to $2,047.85. The appellant’s answer admits the contract, but denies compliance therewith on the part of the respondent, and also alleges an over-payment to the respondent, amounting to $2,187.80, and prays judgment for that amount- Respondent’s reply denies the new matter in the answer. Upon these issues, the case was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict was…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Miller Cattle Co. v. MatticeArizona Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Smith v. Lambert Transfer Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Pacific & Puget Sound Bottling Co. v. ClitheroWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Platt v. MannheimerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API