Legal Opinion

Colemere v. Layton

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 23, 1933No. 5194Published

1Opinion of the Court

MOFFAT, Justice.

This is a claim and delivery action involving certain cattle. The case was tried to the court without a jury upon the issue of ownership between the plaintiff and the defendants Lay-ton. Upon stipulation the action was dismissed with pre judice as to the defendants Thornley. Judgment was for the defendants, and plaintiff appeals.

Three errors are assigned: (1) That the findings are erroneous; (2) that the conclusion of law is not supported by the findings of fact; and (3) that the judgment is contrary to and is not supported by the evidence.

This case is a law case. We may not…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Sutton v. Otis Elevator Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Mangum v. Bullion, Beck & Champion Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Nelson v. Southern Pacifc Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Whittaker v. FergusonUtah Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Linden v. Anchor Mining Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1899

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API