Legal Opinion

Owen v. Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Co.

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1898PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from circuit court, Codington county. Hon,. J. O. Andrews, Judge. Action in claim and delivery by W. H. Owen and C. A. Margeson, partners as Owen & Margeson, against the Burlington, Cedar Rapids & Northern Railway Company. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtFuller, J.

Mortgagees brought this action in claim and delivery to recover the possession of a portable contrivance called a “merry-go-round,” consisting of revoling chariots and wooden horses, operated upon a platform by a steam engine, all of which the defendant, a common carrier, detains in order to maintain its lien for transportation at the request of a mortgagor in possession. As we view the record, the only question essential to a determination of this appeal by the defendant from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs js whether the lien of a chattel mortgage properly filed is prior to that given by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wright v. ShermanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Richardson v. RichMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J. C. Walden Auto Co. v. MixonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Corinth Engine & Boiler Works v. Mississippi Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API