Legal Opinion

Niagara Share Corp. v. Commissioner

United States Board of Tax Appeals

Decided May 8, 1934No. Docket Nos. 66922-66926Published

1. A loss sustained in 1929 by a corporation through the liquidation, prior to dissolution, of an affiliated corporation of which it owns all the shares is not deductible on consolidated return, Ilfeld Co. v. Hernandez,292 U.S. 62. 2. The exchange by a corporation of shares held by it in an unaffiliated corporation for some of its own shares owned by the other corporation, the value of its own shares received being less than the cost of the shares given up, supports a…

Read the full summary

1. A loss sustained in 1929 by a corporation through the liquidation, prior to dissolution, of an affiliated corporation of which it owns all the shares is not deductible on consolidated return, Ilfeld Co. v. Hernandez,292 U.S. 62. 2. The exchange by a corporation of shares held by it in an unaffiliated corporation for some of its own shares owned by the other corporation, the value of its own shares received being less than the cost of the shares given up, supports a deduction for loss.

1Opinion of the Court

NIAGARA SHARE CORPORATION (OF DELAWARE), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

NIAGARA SHARE CORPORATION (OF NEW YORK), PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

MORTGAGE SECURITY CORPORATION OF NEW JERSEY, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

KNICKERBOCKER FUNDING CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

MORSECO REALTY CORPORATION, PETITIONER, v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RESPONDENT.

Niagara Share Corp. v. Commissioner

Docket Nos. 66922-66926.

United States Board of Tax Appeals

30 B.T.A. 668;…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Charles Ilfeld Co. v. HernandezSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Niagara Share Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API