Legal Opinion

United States v. Newton

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided May 19, 1923No. 156Published

1Opinion of the CourtNeterer, District Judge

(after stating the facts as above). Section 8 of Act March 3, 1891, provides:

“That suits by the United States to vacate and annul any patent heretofore issued shall only be brought within five years from the passage of this act, -and suits to vacate and annul patents hereafter issued shall only be brought within 6 years after the date of the issuance of such patents.”

The title vested and the defendant was entitled to patent two years after the issuance of his final receipt. Payne v. U. S., 255 U. S. 438, 41 Sup. Ct. 368, 65 L. Ed. 720. The mere naked title remained in the government. If the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Payne v. United States Ex Rel. NewtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. United States v. Puget Sound Traction, Light & Power Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1914
  3. United States v. Bellingham Bay Improvement Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API