Legal Opinion
Peltack v. Borough of Manville
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided September 23, 1982No. Civ. A. 81-3645PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAROLD A. ACKERMAN, District Judge.
Under New Jersey’s criminal code a person holding public office, whether elective or appointive, must forfeit that office upon his or her conviction of an offense “involving or touching such office.” N.J.S.A. 2C:51-2 as repealing N.J.S.A. 2A:135-9. That law also provides that “[i]f the conviction be reversed, he shall be restored, if feasible, to his office ... with all the rights, emoluments and salary thereof from the date of forfeiture.” N.J.S.A. 2C:51-2(b)(2). Plaintiff, Francis Peltack, has brought this suit under the Civil Rights Act 42 U.S.C.…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Aitchison v. RaffianiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Fuchilla v. ProckopDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1987
- Hornstine v. Township of MoorestownDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2003
- Grubb v. Borough of HightstownNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Heslip v. LobbsDistrict Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1982
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.