Legal Opinion

Estep v. Hardeman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 3, 1985No. 85SA47PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NEIGHBORS, Justice.

Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we issued a rule to show cause why the respondent district court judge should not disqualify himself from hearing a motion for post-conviction relief in a criminal case in which he is alleged to be biased. We now make the rule absolute.

I

The petition for a writ of mandamus and the accompanying affidavits recite the following facts pertinent to our resolution of this original proceeding: In 1975, the peti tioner, Park Estep, was convicted of, among other crimes, first-degree murder, and sentenced to a prison term of 48 to 67 years. 1 In 1984, Estep…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  2. People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  3. Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  4. Nicodemus v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
  5. People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  3. James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
  4. People v. EstepColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
  5. on v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API