Estep v. Hardeman
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
NEIGHBORS, Justice.
Pursuant to C.A.R. 21, we issued a rule to show cause why the respondent district court judge should not disqualify himself from hearing a motion for post-conviction relief in a criminal case in which he is alleged to be biased. We now make the rule absolute.
I
The petition for a writ of mandamus and the accompanying affidavits recite the following facts pertinent to our resolution of this original proceeding: In 1975, the peti tioner, Park Estep, was convicted of, among other crimes, first-degree murder, and sentenced to a prison term of 48 to 67 years. 1 In 1984, Estep…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- People v. BothamSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Bernice ROBERTS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Benjamin F. BAILAR, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Nicodemus v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1979
- People v. District CourtSupreme Court of Colorado · 1977
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. DrakeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
- Rodriguez v. District Court for the City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- James v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- People v. EstepColorado Court of Appeals · 1990
- on v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 2020
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.