Legal Opinion

Scott v. State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided February 24, 1987PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HORSEY, Justice:

Defendant, Lemuel Scott, seeks reversal of his convictions in a jury trial of Rape in the First Degree (11 Del.C. § 764) and Kidnapping in the First Degree (11 Del. C. § 783A). Defendant was sentenced to consecutive life terms for each offense, with the rape conviction requiring twenty years minimum mandatory sentence. On appeal, defendant asserts seven grounds for reversal. The issues raised involve essentially four subjects: (1) right to a speedy trial; (2) evidentiary matters; (3) jury instructions; and (4) sufficiency of the evidence to support the defendant’s convictions.…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Hoffman Estates v. Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Delaware v. FenstererSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. McDougall v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Younger v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  2. Robertson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
  3. Skinner v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
  4. Weber v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
  5. Coleman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API