Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cruce v. Eureka Life Insurance Co. of America

Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)

Decided August 1, 1985No. 05-84-01151-CVPublished

1DissentHowell, Justice

I dissent. According to a 1975 holding of the Supreme Court, after a default occurs and before the lender may exercise its optional right of acceleration, the Supreme Court held in 1975 that the lender must make a prior demand for the past due installment and must also provide a prior opportunity to cure the default — both to occur before the lender may proceed to declare the entire balance due. Allen Sales & Servicenter, Inc. v. Ryan, 525 S.W.2d 863 (Tex. 1975). The decision was based upon the principles of equity. A contractual waiver, such as the one quoted in the majority opinion, cannot…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ogden v. Gibraltar Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Allen Sales & Servicenter, Inc. v. RyanTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sonny Arnold, Inc. v. Sentry Savings Ass'nTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Parker v. MazurCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Faulk v. FutchTexas Supreme Court · 1948

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API