Legal Opinion

Schettino v. Roizman Development, Inc.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 21, 1999PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

POLLOCK, J.

The issue is whether, in an action asserting joint and several liability of multiple defendants, a single defendant, following rejection of its offer to settle the claim against it, may be awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to the offer-of-judgment rule, Rule 4:58-1, -2 and -3.

Plaintiff, John Schettino, alleged that four defendants were jointly and severally liable to him for a real estate broker’s commission of $390,000. One set of defendants, Israel Roizman, Roizman Development, Inc., and Fairview Associates 94 L.P. (collectively, “Roizman”)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  2. Crudup v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  3. Schettino v. Roizman Development, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Gonzalez v. Safe & Sound Security Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
  2. Wiese v. DedhiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  3. DeBrango v. Summit BancorpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
  4. Finderne Mgmt. Co. v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
  5. Serico v. RothbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API