Schettino v. Roizman Development, Inc.
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
POLLOCK, J.
The issue is whether, in an action asserting joint and several liability of multiple defendants, a single defendant, following rejection of its offer to settle the claim against it, may be awarded attorney’s fees pursuant to the offer-of-judgment rule, Rule 4:58-1, -2 and -3.
Plaintiff, John Schettino, alleged that four defendants were jointly and severally liable to him for a real estate broker’s commission of $390,000. One set of defendants, Israel Roizman, Roizman Development, Inc., and Fairview Associates 94 L.P. (collectively, “Roizman”)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Printing Mart-Morristown v. Sharp Electronics Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Crudup v. MarreroSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
- Schettino v. Roizman Development, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1998
3Cited by24 opinions
- Gonzalez v. Safe & Sound Security Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2005
- Wiese v. DedhiaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
- DeBrango v. Summit BancorpNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2000
- Finderne Mgmt. Co. v. BarrettNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2008
- Serico v. RothbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2018
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.