Legal Opinion

Campbell v. State

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided January 14, 2005No. 13A01-0308-CR-289PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BAKER, Judge.

Appellant-defendant Wayne Campbell appeals his convictions on two counts of Attempted Murder,1 a class A felony, and Burglary Resulting in Serious Bodily Injury,2 a class A felony, claiming that reversal is warranted because: (1) his right against self-inerimination was violated when police officers interrogated him before he was given the Miranda3 warnings; (2) the evi-denee was insufficient to support the convictions; (8) the enhanced conviction for burglary resulting in serious bodily injury cannot stand because the enhancement was based upon the same act used to…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Joyner v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Davis v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wayne A. Campbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Wayne Campbell v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API