Legal Opinion
Brill v. Hedges
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided June 24, 1991No. C-2-90-0701PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
KINNEARY, Senior District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court to consider the cross motions of the parties for summary judgment. Fed.R.Civ.P. 56.
I. STATEMENT OF FACTS
The undisputed facts in this case are as follows. Plaintiff Michelle Brill was divorced from her husband on July 8, 1988. Because her attorney had informed her that returning to her maiden name (Wal ton) would be a difficult and expensive process, she retained Brill as her surname.
On December 19,1989, Brill gave birth to a son whom she named Stephen James Walton. It is not…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Powers v. TiebauerMississippi Supreme Court · 2005
- Redmond v. Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007
- Jessica Powers v. Eric TiebauerMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
- Redmond v. Jockey ClubCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2007