Legal Opinion
Threshermen's Mutual Insurance v. Wallingford Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 16, 1994No. 93-2085PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from summary judgment determinations. Thresherman’s Mutual Insurance Company (“Threshermen’s”) asserted claims of failure to indemnify or to make contribution against Liberty Mutual Insurance Company (“Liberty”) and its excess carrier Wallingford Mutual Insurance Co., Ltd. (“Wallingford”). The district court held that Threshermen’s contentions were barred by res judicata and by the statute of limitations. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the district court.
I
BACKGROUND
A. State Court Action
On August 16, 1987, John Brady fractured his…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Migra v. Warren City School District Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Peregrine Financial Group, Inc. v. TradeMaven, L.L.C.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2009
- Threshermen's Mutual Insurance Company v. Wallingford Mutual Insurance Company, Liberty Mutual Insurance Company, Defendant-Third/party v. John Brady, Ginger L. Brady and Jeffrey Brady and Jamie Brady, Minors by Their Guardian Ad Litem, James J. Murphy, Third/partyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Layton Construction Co. v. Shaw Contract Flooring Services, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2016
- Pt (Persero) Merpati Nusantara Airlines v. Hume & Associates PcDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
- Unipro Graphics, Inc. v. Vibrant Impressions, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2021