Legal Opinion
Claim of Cucinella v. New York City Transit Authority
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 24, 2011PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*1454Claimant sustained injuries to his neck and back in March 2000 during his employment as a bus driver. Thereafter, he was awarded workers’ compensation benefits and, in July 2002, was found to be permanently partially disabled. In March 2006, the self-insured employer raised the issue of whether claimant had violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a. A workers’ compensation law judge determined that claimant had violated Workers’ Compensation Law § 114-a and assessed the mandatory penalty of forfeiture of benefits for the period between January 2002 and January 2005. On appeal, the Workers’…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Claim of Fabiano v. SearsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Claim of Morrison v. T & D Painting, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Claim of Alund v. Malt River Brewing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
3Cited by8 opinions
- Deering v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Bleakley v. Verizon Services GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Bleakley v. Verizon Services GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Claim of Pendock v. Matrix Communications GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Claim of Pendock v. Matrix Communications GroupAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.