Legal Opinion

Karl v. Amoco Production Co.

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided August 19, 1986No. 86-496PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1280MOTION TO DISMISS

KING, Judge.

The defendant-appellee, Ford Motor Company, moves to dismiss the appeal of the plaintiff-appellant, William Arthur Karl, on the grounds that the plaintiff having accepted a remittitur of the damages awarded him in the trial court has no right to appeal the reformed judgment.

The trial court signed a final judgment on November 12, 1985, finding the mover, Ford Motor Company, liable to the appellant, William Karl, in the amount of seven hundred forty eight thousand forty six and 3/100 ($748,046.03) dollars, as well as liable to Mrs. Karl and their children, the other…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Miller v. Chicago Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Accardo v. CenacLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
  2. Sloan v. MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011
  3. Bazare v. Transit Casualty Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Cece Sloan v. Renee MoutonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API