Legal Opinion
United States v. Salberg
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 13, 1923No. 7348PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
Defendant demurs generally to the indictment, and in support thereof urges that the crime alleged appears by the face of the indictment to be barred by the statute of limitations. The indictment charges that the defendant, being a person required by the Act of May 18, 1917, commonly known as the Selective Service Act (Comp. St. 1918, Comp. St. Ann. Supp. 1919, §§ 2044a-2044k), to register on June 5, 1917, as required by the President’s proclamation, failed and refused, unlawfully and feloniously, so to do. He is not charged with failing or refusing to register at…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Koshkonong v. BurtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Ogden, Administrator of Cornell v. Blackledge, of SalterSupreme Court of the United States · 1804
- State v. . KeithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Toussie v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Presley v. Mississippi State Hwy. Com'nMississippi Supreme Court · 1992
- United States v. KrepperCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1946
- United States v. Gary John EklundCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- In Re ShearDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1956
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.