Legal Opinion

State v. Eklund

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1994No. 93-188PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hunt

Defendant Robert John Eklund was found guilty of sexual intercourse without consent following a jury trial in the District Court for the Eleventh Judicial District, Flathead County. Eklund moved to dismiss the charge due to lack of a speedy trial, and moved for a mistrial contending that the court allowed the State to introduce inadmissible character evidence at trial. The District Court denied both motions. Eklund appeals.

We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand for retrial.

The issues are:

1. Was Eklund denied a speedy trial since 197 days elapsed between his arrest and his trial?

2. Did…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. State v. JonesMontana Supreme Court · 1914
  3. People v. MullingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  4. State ex rel. Briceno v. District Court of the Thirteenth Judicial District ex rel. County of YellowstoneMontana Supreme Court · 1977
  5. State v. CurtisMontana Supreme Court · 1990

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. WeeksMontana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Billings v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. CollierMontana Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Lopez v. JosephsonMontana Supreme Court · 2001

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API